KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL.
v.
PREISLER ET AL.

U.S. | 1967-01-09
No. 738
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
385 U.S. 450 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (U.S. 1968)
    …t it nevertheless permitted the 1966 Missouri congressional elections to be conducted under the void act. Preisler v. Secretary of State, 257 F. Supp. 953 [*68] (D. C. W. D. Mo. 1966). We affirmed on January 9,1967, sub nom. Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 385 U. S. 450. In 1967, the Missouri General Assembly made still another attempt to enact a constitutional plan, but on December 29, 1967, this plan was also invalidated. 279 F. Supp. 952. Cf. Scott v. Germano, 381 U. S. 407, 409 (1965), in which we stated that…
  • Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1969)
    …ute too was declared unconstitutional. The District Court, however, retained jurisdiction to review any further plan that might be enacted. Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri, 257 F. Supp. 953 (1966), aff’d, sub nom. Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 385 U. S. 450 (1967). In 1967, the General Assembly enacted the statute under attack here, Mo. Rev. Stat., c. 128 (Cum. Supp. 1967), and the Attorney General of Missouri moved in the District Court for a declaration sustaining the Act and an order dismissing the…
  • Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254 (U.S. 2003)
    …of Section 2(a)(c) [sic],” “the congressional elections for Missouri will be ordered conducted at large until new and constitutional districts are created.” Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri, 257 F. Supp. 953, 981, 982 (WD Mo. 1966), aff’d, 385 U. S. 450 (1967) (per curiam,). In Meeks v. Anderson, 229 F. Supp. 271, 273-274 (Kan. 1964), and Baker v. Clement, 247 F. Supp. 886, 897-898 (MD Tenn. 1965), three-judge District Courts stayed their hands but [*270] held forth the possibility of requiring a…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw