BALDWIN-LIMA-HAMILTON CORP.

v.

JACKSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ohio v. Kentucky, 410 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1973)
  …he bill of complaint was granted. 384 U. S. 982 (1966). Kentucky by its answer admitted the allegations of the above-quoted numbered paragraphs of Ohio’s complaint. The Court then appointed the Honorable Phillip Forman as Special Master in the case. 385 U. S. 803 (1966). Five years later, in August 1971, Ohio moved for leave to file an amended complaint. By this amendment Ohio would assert that the boundary between it and Kentucky is the middle of the Ohio River, or, only alternatively, is the 1792 low wate…
• Ohio v. Kentucky, 444 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)
  …e two States is “the low water mark on the [*336] northerly side of the Ohio River in the year 1792.” Leave to file the bill of complaint was granted. 384 U. S. 982 (1966). In due course, Kentucky filed its answer and a Special Master was appointed. 385 U. S. 803 (1966). In its answer, Kentucky alleged that the boundary fine is the current low-water mark on the northerly side of the Ohio River. Ohio later moved for leave to file an amended complaint that would assert, primarily, that the boundary between Ohi…