COLLINS
v.
WILSON, WARDEN; BRYANS V. UNITED STATES; JOPLIN V. BOHANON ET AL.; AND ALLEN V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLLINS
WILSON, WARDEN; BRYANS V. UNITED STATES; JOPLIN V. BOHANON ET AL.; AND ALLEN V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
385 U.S. 808
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Camara v. Mun. Court of the City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1967)…See v. City of Seattle, post, p. 541, to re-examine whether administrative inspection programs, as presently authorized and conducted, violate Fourth Amendment rights as those rights are enforced against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. 385 U. S. 808. Appellant brought this action in a California Superior Court alleging that he was awaiting trial on a criminal charge of violating the San Francisco Housing Code by refusing to permit a warrantless inspection of his residence, and that a writ of p…
-
SEE v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1967)…f interpreted to authorize this warrantless inspection of his warehouse, would violate his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. We noted probable jurisdiction and set this case for argument with Camara v. Municipal Court, ante, p. 523. 385 U. S. 808. We find the principles enunciated in the Camara opinion applicable here and therefore we reverse. In Camara, we held that the Fourth Amendment bars prosecution of a person who has refused to permit a warrantless code-enforcement inspection of his…