STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. ET AL.

v.

TASHIRE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1967)
  …he lineup did not violate Wade’s Fifth Amendment rights, “the lineup, held as it was, in the absence of counsel, already chosen to represent appellant, was a violation of his Sixth Amendment rights . . . .” 358 F. 2d 557, 560. We granted certiorari, 385 U. S. 811, and set the case for oral argument with No. 223, Gilbert v. California, post, p. 263, and No. 254, Stovall v. Denno, post, p. 293, which present similar questions. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand to that court with direct…
• Curtis Publ'g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1967)
  …ory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice’ — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” We brought these two cases here, 385 U. S. 811, 385 U. S. 812, to consider the impact of that decision on libel actions instituted by persons who are not public officials, but who are “public figures” and involved in issues in which the public has a justified and important interest. The sweep of…
• State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1967)
  …injunction and dismissal of the action.. Because the Court of Appeals’ decision on this point conflicts with those of other federal courts,4 and concerns a matter of significance to the administration of federal interpleader, we granted certiorari. 385 U. S. 811 (1966). Although we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals upon the jurisdictional question, we direct a substantial modification of the District Court’s injunction for reasons which will appear. [*530] I. Before considering the issues pres…