ASSOCIATED PRESS

v.

WALKER

Citator

Cited By

• Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1967)
  …of these statutes the trial judge sustained the State’s objection and refused to allow Fuller to testify. Petitioner’s conviction followed, and it was upheld on appeal by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 400 S. W. 2d 756. We granted certiorari. 385 U. S. 812. We reverse. I. We have not previously been called upon to decide whether the right of an accused to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, guaranteed in federal trials by the Sixth Amendment, is so fundamental and essential…
• Curtis Publ'g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1967)
  …elating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice’ — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” We brought these two cases here, 385 U. S. 811, 385 U. S. 812, to consider the impact of that decision on libel actions instituted by persons who are not public officials, but who are “public figures” and involved in issues in which the public has a justified and important interest. The sweep of the New York T…
• Vicaretti v. Henderson, 645 F.2d 100 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …, Marchetti v. United States, 385 U.S. 1000, 87 S.Ct. 698, 17 L.Ed.2d 540 (1967); Berger v. New York, 385 U.S. 967, 87 S.Ct. 505, 17 L.Ed.2d 432 (1966); Bostick v. South Carolina, 385 U.S. 813, 87 S.Ct. 81, 17 L.Ed.2d 53 (1966); Washington v. Texas, 385 U.S. 812, 87 S.Ct. 123, 17 L.Ed.2d 54 (1966). Though the standards for the exercise of the Supreme Court’s certiorari authority [*102] differ from those applicable to issuance of a certificate of probable cause, compare Sup. Ct.Rule 19 with Alexander v. Ha…