LEVIN
v.
MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.; AND ALLEGHANY CORP. ET AL. V. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.
LEVIN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.; AND ALLEGHANY CORP. ET AL. V. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.
385 U.S. 814
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The State OF Tex. & Dr. George J. Beto v. Payton, 390 F.2d 261 (5th Cir. 1968)…6. . Clewis’ conviction was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas October 4, 1965, rehearing denied Novem- [*269] her 10, 1965, Second Motion for Rehearing denied (with opinion) January 5, 1966. Certiorari was granted October 10, 1966, 385 U.S. 814, 87 S.Ct. 104. The opinions of the Court of Appeals appear at 415 S.W. 2d 654. . Upon inquiry of the Attorney General of Texas we are advised that Clewis’ trial commenced May 11, 1964, in the district court of Midland County, Texas. Verdict was ren…
-
Levin v. Miss. River Fuel Corp., 386 U.S. 162 (U.S. 1967)…rs. 233 F. Supp. 747. The Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that, despite Missouri law, the “plenary character of § 5 (11) . . . with its consequent preemptive nature” compelled a contrary result. 359 F. 2d 106, at 119. We granted certiorari. 385 U. S. 814. We have concluded that Missouri law, as provided by § 5 (11), is controlling on the point and that the judgment must, therefore, be reversed. I. • Background of the Parties and the Litigation. MoPac, a Missouri corporation, is an interstate comm…
-
Brennan v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm'n & John J. Gordon Co., 492 F.2d 1027 (2d Cir. 1974)…06 U.S. 601, 604-605, 59 S.Ct. 668, 83 L.Ed. 1014 (1939); cf. NLRB v. Vulcan Forging Co., 188 F. 2d 927, 930 (6 Cir. 1951); see also United States v. Ricciardi, 357 F. 2d 91, 97-98 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 942, 86 S.Ct. 1464, 16 L.Ed.2d 540; 385 U.S. 814, 87 S.Ct. 35, 17 L.Ed.2d 55 (1966) (interpreting the phrase “industry affecting commerce” as defined in the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 142(1)). As was said by Congressman Steiger in presenting to the House the Conference Report on the Occupationa…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence