NORTON

v.

CAMPBELL, GOVERNOR OF NEW MEXICO, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Willeford v. Estelle, 538 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …e law, even though the state was under no initial obligation to provide that benefit, is a denial of constitutionally required due process, and is cognizable under federal habeas corpus. Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1966, 355 F. 2d 1016, cert. denied 1966, 385 U.S. 839, 87 S.Ct. 88, 17 L.Ed.2d 72. He asserts, moreover, that by being sentenced under the incorrect statute, he was not only arbitrarily denied benefits under state law, but was treated differently from all other criminal defendants similarly situated, t…
• Gena v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 424 F.2d 227 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir. 1966, 363 F. 2d 234, 235; Chul Hi Kim v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 7 Cir. 1966, 357 F. 2d 904; Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 3 Cir. 1966, 356 F. 2d 986, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 839, 87 S.Ct. 88, 17 L.Ed.2d 73; Schieber v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir. 1965, 347 F. 2d 353, 354. There is a time limit, however, applicable to our review: A petition for review must be filed within six months of the date of the orde…
• Bufalino v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 473 F.2d 728 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …ctober 7, 1971. Our sole question for determination as to said order and its supplement is whether the order’s issuance was an abuse of discretion by the Board. Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 356 F. 2d 986 (3 Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 839, 87 S.Ct. 88, 17 L.Ed.2d 73. See also Velasquez Espinosa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 404 F. 2d 544 (9 Cir. 1968); Gena v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 424 F. 2d 227 (5 Cir. 1970) . Rosa v. Immigration and Naturalization Ser…

  ← 1 / 4 →