FLORIDA EX REL. FARBER
v.
WILLIAMS, JUDGE; AND FLORIDA EX REL. MOLIVER V. WILLIAMS, JUDGE
FLORIDA EX REL. FARBER
WILLIAMS, JUDGE; AND FLORIDA EX REL. MOLIVER V. WILLIAMS, JUDGE
385 U.S. 845
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Campbell v. State, 240 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1970)…* * any inhabitants of any State * * * to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and law of the United States * * * ”; State ex rel. Farber v. Williams, 183 So. 2d 537 (Fla.1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 845, 87 S.Ct. 42, 17 L.Ed.2d 76 (1966), upholding F.S. § 877.02(1), F.S.A., prohibiting solicitation of legal business; McArthur v. State, 191 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1966), upholding F.S. § 317.201, F.S.A., prohibiting “driving while under the influence of int…
-
Agudo, Pineiro & Kates, P.A. v. Harbert Constr. Co., 476 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…nstrued only occasionally. Carricarte v. State, 384 So. 2d 1261 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980); Pace v. State, 368 So. 2d 340 (Fla.1979); State ex rel. Farber v. Williams, 183 So. 2d 537 (Fla.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 845, 87 S.Ct. 42, 17 L.Ed.2d 76 (1966); Thomas v. Ratiner, 462 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). By its own terms, the statute seems to require some form of relationship or agency linking the person covered under the statute and the attorney. It is clear…