DIAZ-ROSENDO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …n furtherance of the conspiracy. Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 363, 32 S.Ct. 793, 800, 56 L.Ed. 1114 (1912); United States v. Williams, 424 F. 2d 344, 352 (5th Cir. 1970); Bellard v. United States, 356 F. 2d 437, 438 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 856, 87 S.Ct. 103, 17 L.Ed.2d 83 (1966); Miller v. Connally, 354 F. 2d 206, 208 (5th Cir. 1965). Clearly, the bulk of the overt acts charged in the indictment occurred in Miami. Similarly, it appears clear that the underlying agreement was formulated in…
• United States v. Dunn, 564 F.2d 348 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …e litany is highly misleading if taken out of the context of the particular cases in which it was made. E. g., Fox v. United States, 381 F. 2d 125, 129 (9th Cir. 1967); Diaz-Rosendo v. United States, 357 F. 2d 124, 130 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 856, 87 S.Ct. 104, 17 L.Ed.2d 83 (1966); United States v. Nunez, supra; and numerous others.18 So taken, and construed to imply that participation in a criminal conspiracy may be proved by evidence that would be inadequate to prove the commission of som…
• United States v. Jones, 425 F.2d 1048 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …ert. denied, 386 U.S. 1033, 87 S.Ct. 1484, 18 L.Ed.2d 595. Once a conspiracy is proved, “slight evidence is all that is required to connect a defendant with the conspiracy.” Diaz-Rosendo v. United States, 357 F. 2d 124 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 856, 87 S.Ct. 104, 17 L.Ed.2d 83, citing Sabari v. United States, 333 F. 2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1964), rehearing denied, July 9 1964. It seems clear to us that the proof in this case was sufficient for the jury to find that a single conspiracy did exist, an…