WATTS

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Nickulis Gillis v. State, 930 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …n a substantial period of time has elapsed between the arrest and processing and the seizure of the property, regardless of whether the property is found in. the arres-tee’s cell or held under the arrestee’s name in the property room), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 862, 87 S.Ct. 116, 17 L.Ed.2d 88 (1966); State v. Mejia, 579 So. 2d 766, 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(“Once the defendant is in custody, the items that were on his person at the time of his arrest may lawfully be searched and seized without a warrant....”).…
• United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 (U.S. 1974)
  …Edwards to wear, and it would certainly have been unreasonable for the police to have stripped respondent of his clothing and left him exposed in his cell throughout the night. Cf. United States v. Caruso, 358 F. 2d 184, 185-186 (CA2), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 862 (1966). When the substitutes were purchased the next morning, the clothing he had been wearing at the time of arrest was taken from him and subjected to laboratory analysis. This was no more than taking from respondent the effects in his immediate…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ely instructed the jury that all cases are important — this one no more so than the next. The instruction was sufficient to minimize any prejudice from the improper comment. See, e. g., United States v. Caruso, 358 F. 2d 184 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 862, 87 S.Ct. 116, 17 L.Ed.2d 88 (1966). [*829] E. Sufficiency of the Evidence Defendants Bright, Briggs, Chaney, Harbin-father and Harbin-son argue there was insufficient evidence to sustain their convictions. 1. Substantive RICO Violation Section 1…