MUNDT ET UX.

v.

ZALUSKEY ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• The Calland Corp. v. United Ins. Co. OF Am., 408 F.2d 1199 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …rustee’s sale on October 21, 1965. Appellant thus had more than nine months to come up with a plan or a buyer. We find no abuse of discretion. Mundt v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 9 Cir., 1965, 349 F. 2d 938, cert. denied, Mundt v. Zaluskey, 385 U.S. 871, 87 S.Ct. 142, 17 L.Ed.2d 98. The first appeal is without merit. OTHER APPEALS What we have said disposes also of the second, third, fourth, and seventh appeals. The fifth appeal involves an insurance draft for $2,380.20 payable because of a fir…
• Anderson v. United States, 427 F.2d 165 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …motion under Section 2255 unless it is so defective on its [*167] face as not to charge an offense under any reasonable construction.” An indictment with similar language was upheld in Mohler v. United States, 360 F. 2d 915, 916 (C.A. 7), cert. den. 385 U.S. 871, 87 S.Ct. 143, 17 L.Ed.2d 99. In Clark v. United States, 400 F. 2d 83, 85 (C.A. 9), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1036, 89 S.Ct. 654, 21 L.Ed.2d 581, an indictment was not invalid because it alleged “interstate commerce” instead of “foreign commerce” where it…