ANDERSON
v.
NEW YORK
ANDERSON
NEW YORK
385 U.S. 879
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Finnerty, 470 F.2d 78 (3d Cir. 1972)…terfeit nature of the money can seldom be proven by direct evidence. Tims, circumstantial evidence is generally relied upon to provide a basis from which knowledge may be inferred. United States v. Carlson, 359 F. 2d 592, 597 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 879, 87 S.Ct. 161, 17 L.Ed.2d 106 (1966). . A review of the testimony of defendant, Finnerty, reveals inconsistencies, previous lies, and past convictions for crimes of dishonesty, indicative perhaps, of a proclivity towards false dealings. In these ac…