FANELLI

v.

NEW YORK; SCHLETTE V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; LOPEZ V. CALIFORNIA; IN RE WINHOVEN, ABDELKADER V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; BICKLEY ET AL. V. OLIVER, WARDEN, ET AL.; CHEVALLIER V. TEXAS; EDWARDS V. HOLMAN, WARDEN; RICHARDSON V. ILLINOIS; BEVERLY V. CALIFORNIA; MCGREGOR V. NEW YORK; MORRIS V. WEST VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By

• Morris v. Otto C. Boles, 386 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1967)
  …from the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. He then sought a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States, and this was denied, Morris v. West Virginia, 384 U.S. 1022, 86 S.Ct. 1944, 16 L.Ed.2d 1025 (1966), rehearing denied 385 U.S. 891, 87 S.Ct. 19, 17 L.Ed.2d 124 (1966). Identical writs of habeas corpus were then filed in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, and the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. The West Vir-' ginia Supreme Court denied the petition,…
• Little v. United States, 417 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …was inadmissible evidence against him. Rule 5(a), Fed.R.Crim.P., regulates the conduct of federal officers, not state officers. Edwards v. Holman, (5 Cir.1965) 342 F. 2d 679, cert. denied 384 U.S. 1017, 86 S.Ct. 1934, 16 L.Ed.2d 1039, rehr. denied 385 U.S. 891, 87 S.Ct. 17, 17 L.Ed.2d 124. The burden of proving a violation of Rule 5(a) is on the defendant. Barnett v. United States, (5 Cir. 1967) 384 F. 2d 848, 859. The record here does not show whether the confession occurred before or after the appellant…
• Whitfield v. United States, 383 F.2d 142 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …sel and that her motion to suppress it should have been granted. She challenges the soundness of our decision in Kohatsu v. United States, 351 F. 2d 898 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1011, 86 S. Ct. 1915, 16 L.Ed.2d 1017, rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 891, 87 S.Ct. 15, 17 L.Ed. 2d 122 (1966), followed in Selinger v. Bigler, 377 F. 2d 542 (9th Cir. 1967). While our opinion in Kohatsu has been criticized (see United States v. Turzyn [*144] ski, D.C., 268 F.Supp. 847 (N.D.Illl. 1967)), we do not here…