SIMPSON

v.

LOUISIANA; DEFLUMER V. NEW YORK; ROSS V. CALIFORNIA; WALDEN V. PATE, WARDEN; RILEY V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; ALLEN V. FLORIDA; GOLSON ET AL. V. ILLINOIS; BAZAURE V. CALIFORNIA; JACOBSON V. CALIFORNIA; MONTGOMERY V. FLORIDA; SMITH V. OHIO; BENNETT V. TEXAS; GILLESPIE V. VIRGINIA; BELL V. COLORADO; CHATTERTON V. GEORGIA; DRUMMOND V. UNITED STATES; WRIGHT V. CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Brown, 569 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …on — that a mere suspect may win his freedom on the spot by “clearing up a few things.” Cf. United States v. Drummond, 354 F. 2d 132, 144 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1013, 86 S.Ct. 1968, 16 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1966), rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 892, 87 S.Ct. 24, 17 L.Ed.2d 126 (1966). Even in the courtroom, where an impartial judicial officer is presumably impelled by no purpose but fairness, that officer must counsel with care and advise against the likely folly of a layman’s proceeding witho…
• United States ex rel. James L. Forella v. Hon. Harold W. Follette, 405 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …Accardi, 342 F. 2d 697, 701 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 954, 86 S.Ct. 426, 15 L.Ed.2d 359 (1965). In United States v. Drummond, 354 F. 2d 132 (2 Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied 384 U.S. 1013, 86 S.Ct. 1968, 16 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1965), reh. denied 385 U.S. 892, 87 S.Ct. 24, 17 L.Ed.2d 126 (1966), this court stated: This Court does not view, as Drummond would have us, the absence of counsel at the time admissions are [*683] made as inevitably compelling a finding of inadmissibility. * * * We can see no re…
• United States ex rel. William Perkins v. Pate, 401 F.2d 9 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …le v. Golson, 32 Ill.2d 398, 207 N.E. 2d 68 (1965), because defendants had already been tried for identical misconduct in the Mc-Auliffe prosecution. The United States Supreme Court refused certiorari. 384 U.S. 1023, 86 S.Ct. 1951, 16 L.Ed.2d 1026, 385 U.S. 892, 87 S.Ct. 21,17 L.Ed.2d 125 (1966). There was no evidentiary hearing in the habeas corpus case in the district court and the record is in the same form now as when presented to the Illinois Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The di…