DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
385 U.S. 897
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Denver & RIO Grande W. R.R. Co. v. United States, 387 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1967)…t” and for a “lawful object” as those terms are used in § 20a. The ICC approved the acquisition without a hearing. A three-judge District Court for the District of Colorado sustained the ICC order. 255 F. Supp. 704. We noted probable jurisdiction. 385 U. S. 897. We reverse with direction to the District Court to enter a new judgment remanding the case to the ICC for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. REA was organized in 1929 and until 1961 operated on a nonprofit basis under a pooling…
-
Mrs. Geraldine W. Greene v. Vantage S.S. Corp., 466 F.2d 159 (4th Cir. 1972)…damage be permitted under a Moragne cause of action. Maritime law permits recovery for pain and suffering. Dennis v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp., supra, 453 F. 2d at 140; Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F. 2d 344, 347 (3 Cir.) cert. denied 385 U.S. 897, 87 S.Ct. 201, 17 L. Ed.2d 130 (1966); Heredia v. Davies, 12 F. 2d 500, 501 (4 Cir. 1926). Traditionally, however, recovery has been denied where the seaman dies of his injuries. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, 287 U.S. 367, 371, 53 S.Ct. 173, 77…
-
Tyminski v. United States, 481 F.2d 257 (3d Cir. 1973)…ror in failing to expressly state the distinct damages for this loss. .Finally, there is no state law authority to support a separate award for shortening life’s expectancy. Cf. Downie v. United States Line Co., 359 F. 2d 344 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied 385 U.S. 897, 87 S.Ct. 201, 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966). The District Court’s disposition of this issue was correct. Defendant-Appellee contends that the District Court’s award of damages for loss of earnings was clearly erroneous. The contention is based on evidence…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence