PRIMA PAINT CORP.

v.

FLOOD & CONKLIN MFG. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Denver & RIO Grande W. R.R. Co. v. United States, 387 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1967)
  …t” and for a “lawful object” as those terms are used in § 20a. The ICC approved the acquisition without a hearing. A three-judge District Court for the District of Colorado sustained the ICC order. 255 F. Supp. 704. We noted probable jurisdiction. 385 U. S. 897. We reverse with direction to the District Court to enter a new judgment remanding the case to the ICC for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. REA was organized in 1929 and until 1961 operated on a nonprofit basis under a pooling…
• Pfeifer v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 678 F.2d 453 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …and is not materially different from comparable state law. This court carefully surveyed the case law and delineated the permissible elements of recovery in Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F. 2d 344, 347-48 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897, 87 S.Ct. 201, 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966). We adhered in that decision to the general rule that a seaman injured by the tortious conduct of his employer is entitled to an award of damages commensurate with the nature and extent of his injuries. He is ent…