SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

v.

UNITED BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Seminole Tribe OF Florida v. Houghtaling, 589 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …rivate or commercial in character, rather than governmental.” Maryland Casualty Co. v. Citizens First National Bank of West Hollywood, 361 F. 2d 517, 521 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Maryland Casualty Co. v. The Seminole Tribe of Florida, Inc., 385 U.S. 918, 87 S.Ct. 227, 17 L.Ed.2d 143 (1966).2 The Tribe’s petition includes the uncon-troverted assertion that the bingo establishment is owned and operated by a section 16 tribal government. Assuming the Atkinson analysis is correct, the Tribe is therefo…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co., 387 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1967)
  …luded an interest element during the fixed-payment period, the court concluded that the “Flexible Fund” met this test. Because of the importance of the issue, and the need for clarifying the implications of the VALIC decision, we granted certiorari, 385 U. S. 918. We now reverse for reasons given below. First, we do not agree with the Court of Appeals that the “Flexible Fund” contract must be characterized in its entirety. Two entirely distinct promises are included in the contract and their operation is s…
• United States v. State OF Or., 657 F.2d 1009 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …), restored to calendar, U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3156, 69 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1981); Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Neb., 430 F. 2d 143, 147 (8th Cir. 1970); Maryland Cas. Co. v. Citizens Nat’l Bank of W. Hollywood, 361 F. 2d 517, 520-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 918, 87 S.Ct. 227, 17 L.Ed.2d 143 (1966).11 [*1014] Clear policy considerations also militate in favor of the tribe’s power to consent to suit. As the Yakima Tribe itself argues, its treaty with the government secures to it certain powers of self-determ…