HAWKINS

v.

HEROLD, STATE HOSPITAL DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bell, 506 F.2d 207 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …. United States, 367 F. 2d 959, 962 (1st Cir. 1966); United States v. Soles, 482 F. 2d 105, 106 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1027, 94 S.Ct. 455, 38 L.Ed.2d 319 (1973); United States v. Russ, 362 F. 2d 843, 845 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 923, 87 S.Ct. 236, 17 L.Ed.2d 146 (1960). But even in situations of this kind disclosure may, depending on the circumstances, be required. E. g., United States v. Cappabianca, 398 F. 2d 356, 359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 935, 89 S.Ct. 294, 21 L.…
• United States v. Soles, 482 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors. We have had occasion to apply these principles in many cases.6 The most analogous is United States v. Russ, 362 F. 2d 843 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 923, 87 S.Ct. 236, 17 L.Ed.2d 146 (1966). We there sustained a refusal by the same judge to compel the Government to produce or disclose the identity of an informant who had played a role in a narcotics transaction almost identical to the part played…
• United States v. Skeens, 449 F.2d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …tion to the Government” by keeping secret the identity of its informers, on the other. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. City of Burlington, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 65, 351 F. 2d 762, 768 (1965); United States v. Russ, 362 F. 2d 843, 845 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 923, 87 S.Ct. 236, 17 L.Ed.2d 146 (1966). In striking this balance as we do today, we find ourselves in accord with every other federal appellate court, including a panel of this Court in Anderson v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 340, 273 F. 2d 75,…