UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …hanna, 461 F. 2d 1110, 1113-1115 (8 Cir. 1972); United States v. Porter, 441 F. 2d 1204, 1216 (8 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 911, 92 S.Ct. 238, 30 L.Ed.2d 184 (1971); Davis v. United States, 357 F. 2d 438, 440-441 (5 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 927, 87 S.Ct. 284, 17 L.Ed.2d 210 (1966). . We disagree with the government’s view that appellants’ objection to admitting the [*892] deposition was withdrawn when it was agreed that another deposition of Reisman would be taken. The court had made its…
• Boutilier v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 387 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1967)
  …(4), was a term of art intended to exclude homosexuals from entry into the United States. It further found that the term was not void for vagueness and was, therefore, not repugnant to the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. We granted certiorari, 385 U. S. 927, and now affirm. I. Petitioner, a Canadian national, was first admitted to this country on June 22, 1955, at the age of 21. His last entry was in 1959, at which time he was returning from a short trip to Canada. His mother and stepfather and three…
• United States v. Porter, 441 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …tand you are going to call him? “MR. REHM: No, sir. “THE COURT: The jury can completely disregard that, but I will—do you want to object to it or what are you going to do ?” In Davis v. United States, 357 F. 2d 438, 441 (5 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 927, 87 S.Ct. 284, 17 L.Ed.2d 210, the court observed: “The facts and circumstances of each case must be carefully analyzed to determine ‘whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such character that the jury would naturally and neces…