SNIEDZINS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Chick v. Wingo, 387 F.2d 330 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …(Ky.1966). The records of the state court are entitled to a presumption of regularity. This record does not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant was denied counsel. Bates v. Meadows, 358 F. 2d 674 (6th Cir. 1966), cert denied, 385 U.S. 937, 87 S.Ct. 299, 17 L.Ed.2d 217 (1966); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). Appellant also contends that Kentucky “waived” prosecution of these two Kentucky check charges in 1943 when in the course of appellant’s pro…
• Faught v. Cowan, 507 F.2d 273 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …g by a preponderance of the evidence that he had not been advised of his rights. Williams v. Smith, 434 F. 2d 592, 595 (5th Cir. 1970) ; Waddy v. Heer, 383 F. 2d 789, 793 (6th Cir. 1967); Bates v. Meadows, 358 F. 2d 674, 675 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 937, 87 S.Ct. 299, 17 L.Ed.2d 217 (1966). His testimony was uncorroborated and the “District Judge, as the fact finder, was not required to believe the uncorroborated testimony of the petitioner, even though no evidence to the contrary had been (or coul…

  ← 1 / 2 →