SCHNEPP

v.

NEVADA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Anderson, 481 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …145; United States v. Coley (5th Cir. 1971) 441 F. 2d 1299, 1301; United States v. Chase (4th Cir. 1967) 372 F. 2d 453, 467, cert. denied 387 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 1688, 18 L.Ed.2d 626; Braxton v. Peyton (4th Cir. 1966) 365 F. 2d 563, 565, cert. denied 385 U.S. 939, 87 S.Ct. 306, 17 L.Ed.2d 218.3 The purpose of a preliminary hearing is not to provide a discovery mechanism for the defendant, though this may be a collateral or incidental benefit from the hearing, but merely to determine “whether probable cause e…
• United States v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 461 F.2d 58 (4th Cir. 1972)
  …of its policy as it now asks of the Court. It would be unconscionable so to limit it. See Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States (10th Cir. 1965) 349 F. 2d 83, 85-86, cert. den. 382 U.S. 1026, 86 S.Ct. 646, 15 L.Ed.2d 539, reh. den. 385 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 1064, 15 L.Ed.2d 857. The insurer, however, asserts that the insurance policy is a North Carolina contract, to be construed in accordance with the laws of that State, and that Lenoir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Stancil (1965) 263 N.C. 630,…
• United States ex rel. Edward Curtis v. People OF the State OF Ill. & John J. Twomey, 521 F.2d 717 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …sel, 14 Ill.App.3d 105, 302 N.E. 2d 213 (1973) (citing an unpublished decision of the Illinois Supreme Court). Petitioner also argues that federal standards of waiver of counsel apply citing Cox v. Burke, 361 F. 2d 183 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 939, 87 S.Ct. 304, 17 L.Ed.2d 218 but due process only forbids the state from acting in an arbitrary or capricious manner or from acting on an impermissible basis. We need not speculate regarding Illinois standards as applied to this case because the h…