AKERSON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Kappelmann v. DELTA AIR Lines, Inc., 539 F.2d 165 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …Act and the regulations adopted under the authority of that Act. Letter, supra note 24, at 4. . Adler v. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., 41 F.Supp. 366 (E.D.Mo.1941); cf. Spence v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 360 F. 2d 887 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 946, 87 S.Ct. 318, 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966). . Having determined that primary resort to the agency is required, we have the further choice of dismissing or staying the proceedings. 3 K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 19.-07(2) (1970). We choose to d…
• Cornman v. The United States, 409 F.2d 230 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …n); Tasker v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 56 (1967).1 The court also attempts to find a resolution of the statute’s possible ambiguity in the legislative history, a clearly proper investigation. Akerson v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 551, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 946, 87 S.Ct. 320, 17 L.Ed.2d 226 (1966); Thermo King Corp. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 860, 354 F. 2d 242 (1965). The court interprets the portion it quotes of H.R.Rep. No. 1207 as indicating that Congress intended the change from $5,000 to $50,000 to…
• Ward v. The United States Donna Sue Ward Pipkin, 646 F.2d 474 (Ct. Cl. 1981)
  …tary pay, and not state or common law concepts of contract rights. Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393, 81 S.Ct. 1230, 6 L.Ed.2d 365 (1961); Andrews v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 561 (1966); and Akerson v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 551, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 946, 87 S.Ct. 320, 17 L.Ed.2d 226 (1966). We need not and do not follow Texas probate law to determine the distribution of Captain Ward’s pay or to determine what Captain Ward’s intent was or would have been regarding such distribution. Plaintiff conte…