GUNSTON

v.

UNITED STATES; DELAWARE ET AL. V. NEW YORK ET AL.; MONASTERSKY V. UNITED STATES; CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC CO., INC., ET AL. V. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION ET AL.; MARSHALL V. UNITED STATES; SANDOVAL ET UX. V. RATTIKIN, TRUSTEE; BENTVENA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; TIETZ ET AL. V. MARIENTHAL ET AL.; RUSKIN V. UNITED STATES; MAXFIELD ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; REED V. ILLINOIS; ALABAMA-TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; CAPELOUTO V. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. OF FLORIDA, INC.; FERNICOLA V. UNITED STATES; ZUCKER V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; CROSS V. BRUNING, COUNTY CLERK OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, ET AL.; BOGART ET UX. V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; WHITTLE, ADMINISTRATOR V. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …reach of non-competition agreements are either not susceptible to proof with the required degree of certainty, Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 183 So. 2d 532, 535 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 11, 87 S.Ct. 78, 17 L.Ed.2d 10, reh’g denied, 385 U.S. 964, 87 S.Ct. 390, 17 L.Ed.2d 310 (1966); see Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11, 12 (Fla. 1974), or “if susceptible of reasonable proof, may not compensate for all aspects of such a violation.” Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., 445…
• Sarasota Bev. Co. v. Johnson, 551 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …and, therefore, unenforceable. Capraro; Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11 (Fla.1974); Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Company of Florida, 183 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1966), app. dismissed, 385 U.S. 11, 87 S.Ct. 78, 17 L.Ed.2d 10, reh’g denied, 385 U.S. 964, 87 S.Ct. 390, 17 L.Ed.2d 310 (1966); Standard Newspapers, Inc. v. Woods, 110 So. 2d 397 (Fla.1959); § 542.33, Fla.Stat. (1987). Not, however, since Standard Newspapers, have I discovered any case that considers the fact that section 542.33 and its…
• Micro Plus, Inc. v. Forte Data Sys., Inc., 484 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …he contractual provisions of the Anderson-Forte employment Agreement and upon the precedent of Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Florida, 183 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1966), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 11, 87 S.Ct. 78, [17 L.Ed.2d 10], rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 964, 87 S.Ct. 390 [17 L.Ed.2d 310]. 5. Micro Plus and its officers, agents, employees, servants, directors and those persons and entities in active concert or participation with it including, but not limited to, independent contractors, are enjoined fr…