KELLY, AKA SHANNON
v.
BAIRD, SHERIFF, ET AL.; OYLER V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; DYER V. WILSON, WARDEN; BENNETT V. PATE, WARDEN; AND TODD V. VISENTINE ET AL.
KELLY, AKA SHANNON
BAIRD, SHERIFF, ET AL.; OYLER V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; DYER V. WILSON, WARDEN; BENNETT V. PATE, WARDEN; AND TODD V. VISENTINE ET AL.
385 U.S. 965
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Carabbia, 381 F.2d 133 (6th Cir. 1967)…ment disclosed the electronic surveillance of the defendant’s premises in accordance with the policy set forth in the Government’s supplemental memorandum to the Supreme Court in Schipani v. United States, 385 U.S. 934, 87 S.Ct. 293, 17 L.Ed.2d 214; 385 U.S. 965, 87 S.Ct. 501, 17 L.Ed.2d 431. Implicit in the Government’s disclosure of such surveillance is a representation on the part of the Government that there was no other electronic surveillance of the defendant. At the hearing, the Internal Revenue spec…