INDIANA & MICHIGAN ELECTRIC CO.

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 404 U.S. 453 (U.S. 1972)
  …al occurrences. “The Commission expert witness Jacobsen acknowledged commingling has never been verified experimentally as fact.” 430 F. 2d 1377, 1384-1385. See principally Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. FPC, 365 F. 2d 180 (CA7), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 972 (1966); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 368 F. 2d 376 (CA8 1966); Public Service Co. of Indiana v. FPC, 375 F. 2d 100 (CA7), cert. denied, 387 U. S. 931 (1967); Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. FPC, 376 F. 2d 506 (CA6), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 84…
• Richmond Power & Light OF the City OF Richmond v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 481 F.2d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …M) pursuant to a 10-year contract dated November 15, 1965.3 I & M is a public utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission, see Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., 33 FPC 739 (1965), affirmed, 7 Cir., 365 F. 2d 180, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 972, 87 S.Ct. 509, 17 L.Ed.2d 435 (1966), and its sales to Richmond are subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction. I & M also has retail customers of its own in certain parts of Indiana, including many industrial users, and its sales to these customers a…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Mulligan, 573 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …t prejudice remains to be determined. Id. at 309; see also United States v. Robbins, 500 F. 2d 650 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Sockel, 478 F. 2d 1134, 1136-37 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Woods, 364 F. 2d 481, 483 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 972, 87 S.Ct. 511, 17 L.Ed.2d 486 (1966); United States v. Eury, 268 F. 2d 517, 521-22 (2d Cir. 1959). If the answer was given in good faith with no deliberate intent to mislead, the trial court may well find that no prejudice resulted, even though the…