DESMEDT, PRESIDENT, AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC., ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1985)
  …ial should be considered “the same” as the phonorecords onto which the sounds were transferred, which were therefore “stolen, converted or taken by fraud” within the meaning of § 2314. Cf. United States v. Bottone, 365 F. 2d 389 (CA2), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 974 (1966). For several reasons, we decline to consider this alternative basis for upholding Dowling’s convictions. The §2314 counts in the indictment were founded exclusively on the allegations that the shipped phonorecords, which contained “Elvis Pre…
• United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …ubmitted to it, or on the second, or on both, there is thus no uncertainty that the jury found every fact necessary [*284] for a valid conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Compare United States v. Bottone, 365 F. 2d 389, 394-395 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974, 87 S.Ct. 514, 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966).28 V. Government’s Exhibit 57-A. An important point in the government’s case on the conspiracy and substantive counts was that Thaler, Altsehul and Jacobs had entered into an agreement for a three-way division o…
• United States v. DiGILIO, 538 F.2d 972 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …. The government, on the other hand, is of the view that the misappropriation of information falls within § 641’s sanction. It places principal reliance on Judge Friendly’s opinion in United States v. Bottone, 365 F. 2d 389 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 974, 87 S.Ct. 514, 17 L.Ed.2d 437 (1966), holding that the microfilming of a scientific process with equipment owned by the thieves, and the asportation of those copies violated 18 U.S.C. § 2314.7 See also United States v. Seagraves, 265 F. 2d 876 (3d C…