GORY ROOFING TILE MANUFACTURING, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
HENRIETTA A. DAVISON ET AL., RESPONDENTS
GORY ROOFING TILE MANUFACTURING, INC., PETITIONER,
HENRIETTA A. DAVISON ET AL., RESPONDENTS
191 So. 2d 40
Florida Supreme Court (1966)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 1939 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing’ date April 28, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Therefore, the petition for certiorari is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (986 total)
-
Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1985)…onclusively the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and the court must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom a summary judgment is sought. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 351 So. 2d 29 (Fla.1977); Roll v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966), cert. denied, 232 So. 2d 181 (Fla.1969). A summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so crystallized that nothing remains but questions of law. Shaffran v. Holness, 93 So. 2d 94 (Fla.1957). If the evidence raises any i…
-
Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station Wqba, 731 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1999)…rove that no genuine issue of material fact exists. See id. Until the moving party conclusively establishes there is no genuine issue of material fact, the legal sufficiency of the evidence on the merits should not be addressed. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla.1966). Summary judgment was granted to Three Kings on the basis of an indemnity clause in the “Participation Agreement.” A contract for indemnity is an agreement by which the promisor agrees to protect the promisee against loss or damages…
-
Wills v. Sears, 351 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 1977)…firmed per curiam without opinion an order of the trial court granting summary judgment to respondent, Sears, Roebuck & Company. The present decision is alleged to be in conflict with Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So. 2d 601 (Fla.1966); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966), and other decisions setting forth the law applicable to summary judgment, which states that grant of summary judgment is improper if there is any genuine issue as to material fact. Because the record proper in this cause reflects conflic…
Previewing 3 of 986 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence