MARTIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Vendola v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 474 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …orce and effect of law between these parties for services arising thereunder.” This is a correct statement of law in those cases to which it is applicable. Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, 365 F. 2d 486 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 714, 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967); American Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Florida-Texas Freight, Inc., 357 F.Supp. 977 (S.D.Fla.1973); Maddalena v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, 382 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Wilkinson v.…
• Landrum v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 505 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …4 (1921); Florida Power Corp. v. Continental Laboratories, Inc., 243 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Tariffs are even recognized as having the force and effect of law. Carter v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 365 F. 2d 486 (5th Cir.1966), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 714, 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967). The justification for an electric company filing a tariff, as in this case with the Public Service Commission, is to regulate the rate practices for the services furnished. Florida Power & Light Co. v. State e…
• Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Brinke, 475 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1973)
  ….2d 126 (1972); Korn v. Franchard Corporation, 2d Cir. 1971, 443 F. 2d 1301, 1306; Semmes Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 2d Cir. 1970, 429 F. 2d 1197; Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, 5th Cir. 1966, 365 F. 2d 486, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 714, 17 L.Ed.2d 546; 3 W. Barron & A. Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1440 (Wright ed. Supp.1971). The Supreme Court has affirmed the power of an appellate court to reach the merits of a case before it on an interlocutory appe…

  ← 1 / 2 →