PRIMUS

v.

WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …v. Marionneaux, 514 F. 2d 1244, 1248 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Gentile, 495 F. 2d 626, 628 n.2 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Bova, 493 F. 2d 33, 35 (5th Cir. 1974); Cupo v. United States, 359 F. 2d 990, 992 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013, 87 S.Ct. 723, 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); King v. United States, 355 F. 2d 700, 704-705 (1st Cir. 1966). See generally 1 C. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 143, § 144 (1969). But see United v. Diaz-Munoz, 632 F. 2d 1330, 1335-1336 (5th Cir. 198…
• United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …ly to prosecutions involving a single defendant. If more than one defendant is indicted, the tests for joinder of counts and defendants is merged in Rule 8(b). See Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324, 359 F. 2d 990, 992 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013, 87 S.Ct. 723, 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); King v. United States, 355 F. 2d 700, 704-705 (1st Cir. 1966); United States v. Eagleston, 417 F. 2d 11, 14 (10th Cir. 1969). . Fed.R.Crim.P. 14 provides, in pertinent part, that: If it appears that a defendan…
• United States v. Demetrios Papadakis and Joseph Novoa, 510 F.2d 287 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …an offense or offenses.” While the United States Attorney should be careful not to “overjoin” where there is a diversity of offenses as well as diverse defendants, see Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324, 359 F. 2d 990 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013, 87 S.Ct. 723, 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967), we do not believe that he overstepped the mark on the face of this pleading. The indictment charged all defendants with conspiracy to violate and substantive violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174, and the indictme…