HAMILTON

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• United States v. Hines, 696 F.2d 722 (10th Cir. 1982)
  …576 F. 2d 285, 289 (10th Cir.1978). The trial judge “must fairly and impartially state the issues and applicable law in logical sequence and in the common speech of man .... ” Elbel v. United States, 364 F. 2d 127, 134 (10th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1014, 87 S.Ct. 727, 17 L.Ed.2d 550 (1967). It is clear to this court that the jury was adequately instructed on the elements of a section 371 conspiracy. The trial court’s instruction to the jury was complete, clear, and not unfairly prejudicial to appe…
• Piccone v. The United States, 407 F.2d 866 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …o not know exactly what [*879] defendant means but I can visualize evidence that would have been competent. An agency interpretation of its own regulation is accorded “due respect.” Baldwin v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 264, 269 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1014, 87 S.Ct. 725, 17 L.Ed.2d 550 (1967). If the contrary were not so entrenched, I would urge that judicial notice never be taken of putative regulations not published in the Register, but that they always be matter of fact for proof as fact, as inde…
• United States v. Newson, 531 F.2d 979 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …bound to give instructions in the form and language requested, and that if the instructions as given are correct and cover the issues of the case, the judgment will not be disturbed. Elbel v. United States, 10 Cir., 364 F. 2d 127, 134, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1014, 87 S.Ct. 726, 17 L.Ed.2d 550. The form of the instructions is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial court and there is no requirement that the judge adopt the exact language of the requested instructions. United States v. Waters, 10 Cir…