LAYTON ET AL.

v.

SELB MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.; MILLER V. UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR; JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING CO. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; BADGLEY ET AL. V. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.; DEVERS V. CAPITAL INVESTORS CO. ET AL.; IZZI V. REZZOLLA ET AL.; DRISCOLL V. TOLEDO BLADE CO.; HIATT V. SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL BANK ET AL.; FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA V. MORRIS ET AL.; GUY V. TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.; MORFORD V. FOGLIANI, WARDEN; BAILEY V. YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA, INC.; BANDY V. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; GEMMEL V. BUCHKOE, WARDEN; JONES V. MANCUSI, WARDEN; BOYDEN V. UNITED STATES; HILLIARD V. TEXAS; HAGINS V. REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF GREENSBORO; OOSTERWYK V. COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ricchetti v. Meister Brau, Inc., 431 F.2d 1211 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …ent of the District Court is accordingly affirmed. . United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co., 253 F.Supp. 129 (N.D.Cal.1966) aff’d mem., Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States, 385 U.S. 37, 87 S.Ct. 240, 17 L.Ed.2d 35 (1966), rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 1021, 87 S.Ct. 702, 17 L.Ed.2d 560 (1967). . Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, provides in part: “No corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no cor…
• Nifty Foods Corp. v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc., 614 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …market includes a number of aluminum alloys, not only particular high-quality aluminum-beryllium alloy); United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co., 253 F.Supp. 129 (N.D. Cal.), aff’d per curiam, 385 U.S. 37, 87 S.Ct. 240, 17 L.Ed.2d 35, reh. denied, 385 U.S. 1021, 87 S.Ct. 702, 17 L.Ed.2d 560 (1966) (private label and “premium” beer are part of the same relevant market). . “[T]he decision of the seller to transfer his business from A to B is valid even though B may have solicited the transfer and even thoug…
• Maglaya v. Buchkoe, 515 F.2d 265 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …issibility of evidence in a state trial does not normally raise constitutional-questions unless it impugns fundamental fairness, Gemmel v. Buchkoe, 358 F. 2d 338 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 402, 17 L.Ed.2d 306, reh. denied, 385 U.S. 1021, 87 S.Ct. 723, 17 L.Ed.2d 561; Burks v. Egeler, 508 F. 2d 672, 6th Cir. Further, we are shown no authority which holds that the denial of discovery at the preliminary examination stage of criminal proceedings rises to the level of a constitutional d…