KELLY ET AL.
v.
CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC.
KELLY ET AL.
CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC.
385 U.S. 1025
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lathrop Douglass v. First Nat'l Realty Corp. Appeal of Sidney S. Brown, 543 F.2d 894 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…2 L.Ed.2d at 690; Drivers’ Local No. 639 v. Penello, 137 U.S. App.D.C. 64, 66-67, 420 F. 2d 632, 634-635 (1969); United States v. Levine, 288 F. 2d 272, 274-275 (2d Cir. 1961); United States v. Conole 365 F. 2d 306, 308 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 743, 17 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967). . Compare Mirra v. United States, 402 F. 2d 888, 890 (2d Cir. 1968); United States v. Harris, 367 F. 2d 826, 827 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1010, 87 S.Ct. 718, 17 L.Ed.2d 547 (1967); Mitchell v. Fio…
-
Trans Int'l Airlines, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters, 650 F.2d 949 (9th Cir. 1980)…dispute arbitration, and an arbitrator’s determination that the strike should stop could be enforced in federal court by an injunction, see Order of Ry. Conductors & Brakemen v. Spokane P. & S. R.R., 366 F. 2d 99, 102 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 752, 17 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967) (RLA); Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 80 S.Ct. 1358, 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960) (NLRA), but that where the breach is so clear that arbitration is not necessary to determine the violation, no injunctio…
-
United States v. Allocco, 994 F.2d 82 (2d Cir. 1993)…ssive. As one court has pointed out, “the punishment imposed should bear [*86] some reasonable relation to the nature and gravity of the contumacious conduct.” United States v. Conole, 365 F. 2d 306, 308 (3d Cir.1966) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 743, 17 L.Ed.2d 673 (1967). In United States v. Ruggiero, 835 F. 2d 443, 446 (2d Cir.1987), we reduced a fine from $10,000 to $2,000, although the behavior of the criminal defendant was far more disruptive than Rubinstein’s. The defendant…