MILLSTEIN

v.

CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1967)
  …be assured of impartial review of his complaint, since the Board’s General Counsel has unreviewable discretion to refuse to institute an unfair labor practice complaint. See United Electrical Contractors Assn. v. Ordman, 366 F. 2d 776, cert. denied, 385 U. S. 1026.8 The existence of even a small group [*183] of cases in which the Board would be unwilling or unable to remedy a union’s breach of duty would frustrate the basic purposes underlying the duty of fair representation doctrine. For these reasons, we ca…
• Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653 (U.S. 1979)
  …we shall see, the Court of Appeals differed with the District Court in this respect. The Court of Appeals relied on two cases, Veatch v. White, 23 F. 2d 69 (CA9 1927), and Uhlhorn v. United States Gypsum Co., 366 F. 2d 211 (CA8 1966), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 1026 (1967), in concluding that, under federal law, “the sudden, perceptible change of the channel, whether within or without the river’s original bed, is a critical factor in defining an avulsion.” 575 F. 2d 620, 637 (CA8 1978). This definition was br…
• United States v. Jones, 425 F.2d 1048 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …eek v. United States, 298 F. 2d 622, 630, 631 (9th Cir. 1962), the least that can be expected from competent counsel is to have them ask for such an aid at the trial court level. Lofland v. United States, 357 F. 2d 472 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1026, 87 S.Ct. 755, 17 L.Ed.2d 675; Bisno v. United States, 299 F. 2d 711 (9th Cir. 1961). Here no special verdict was requested by appellant’s counsel. While we may question if such a request should have been or would have been granted, had it been mad…