WOODINGTON
v.
WISCONSIN
WOODINGTON
WISCONSIN
386 U.S. 9
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woodington v. Mathews, 401 F.2d 125 (7th Cir. 1968)…and a full hearing on the merits was had. The judgment of the trial court was unanimously affirmed. State v. Woodington, 31 Wis.2d 151, 142 N.W. 2d 810 (1966), rehearing denied, 31 Wis.2d 151, 143 N.W. 2d 753, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied, 386 U.S. 9, 87 S.Ct. 854, 17 L.Ed.2d 699 (1967). A petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed in the District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin and was denied. It was followed by a motion for a Certificate of Probable Cause in November, 1967, wh…
-
The Communist Party OF the United States v. United States, 384 F.2d 957 (D.C. Cir. 1967)…(Reed v. Gardner, D. C., 261 F.Supp. 87); and the Government has decided not to appeal in the face of Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11, 86 S.Ct. 1238, 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966). Cf. Appellee’s Suggestion of Mootness, Weiss v. Gardner, judgment vacated, 386 U.S. 9, 87 S.Ct. 861, (February 14, 1967). . Hearings on H.R. 5852 before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 423-24 (1948). The significance of the Attorney General’s reference to White lies in this: The bill to which his commen…