HOLLIS

v.

CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1967-03-13

No. 46

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result .in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

386 U.S. 262 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment

Cited by 14 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result .in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

United States v. Williams, 445 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Edwards, 443 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1971)
Singleton v. United States, 381 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967)

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

HOLLIS v. CALIFORNIA

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

HOLLIS

v.

CALIFORNIA