RICKS
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1967-03-13
No. 36
'Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.
386 U.S. 263 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma 'pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

'Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fontaine v. California, 390 U.S. 593 (U.S. 1968)
    …of California’s harmless-error rule as applied to federal constitutional errors. Thereafter, we granted a petition for a writ of certiorari in the instant case, vacated the judgment below, and remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman. 386 U. S. 263 (1967). On remand, the District Court of Appeal reinstated its former opinion except that it rewrote the portion dealing with harmless error. This time it recited that the constitutional error in this case was harmless “beyond a reasonable doubt” —…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw