HAENDIGES
v.
FORD
HAENDIGES
FORD
386 U.S. 264
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an ádequate state ground.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Guillory v. State, 626 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. This appeal is filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1032, 18 L.Ed.2d 40 (1967). We affirm the judgment but remand this case for correction of the sentence. The written sentence fails to note that the sentence imposed in case number' 92-2638 is to run concurrently with the eighteen-month con…
-
United States v. Williams, 379 F.2d 319 (2d Cir. 1967)…advocate upon appeal, and we have been fully advised of the facts of record and the legal contentions which can be based upon them. Compare Camodeo v. United States, 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070, 18 L.Ed.2d 966 (1967); Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Accordingly, we grant the motion and relieve Anthony F. Marra, Esq., Joshua N. Koplovitz, Esq., and the Legal Aid Society from their assignment. . Paragrajih (III) (5) of this court’s plan under the Criminal…