TETTAMBLE
v.
MISSOURI

U.S. | 1967-03-13
No. 32
386 U.S. 265 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in jornia pauperis and the petition for-a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration in light of Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Swenson v. Donnell, 382 F.2d 248 (8th Cir. 1967)
    …alifornia, 374 U.S. 501, 83 S.Ct. 1S78, 10 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1963) ; Harris v. California, 374 U.S. 499, 83 S.Ct. 1870, 10 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1963) ; Tiller v. California, 372 U.S. 771, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Ed.2a 140 (1963). . See also Tettamble v. Missouri, 386 U.S. 265, 87 S.Ct. 1034, 18 L.Ed.2d 42 (March 13, 1967), reversing per curiam, State v. Tettamble, 394 S.W. 2d 375 (Mo.1965), a post-Douglas decision. . Recent opinions of the Supreme Court, moreover, firmly reiterate its holding that an indigent defendant…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw