WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL.

v.

APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co., 416 U.S. 663 (U.S. 1974)
  …t.. See Mora v. Mejias, 115 F. Supp. 610 (PR 1953);9 Marin v. University of Puerto Rico, 346 F. [*674] Supp. 470, 481 (PR 1972); Suarez v. Administrador del Deporte Hipico de Puerto Rico, 354 F. Supp. 320 (PR 1972). And in Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte, 386 U. S. 268 (1967), we summarily affirmed the decision of a three-judge court for the District of Puerto Rico that had ordered abstention and said: “[Application of the doctrine of abstention is particularly appropriate in a case . . . involving] the construct…
• Posadas de Puerto RICO Assocs. v. Tourism Co. of Puerto RICO, 478 U.S. 328 (U.S. 1986)
  …“sovereign over matters not ruled by the Constitution”); Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte, 266 F. Supp. 401, 405 (PR 1966) (Puerto Rico “should have the primary opportunity through its courts to determine the intended scope of its own legislation”), aff’d, 386 U. S. 268 (1967).6 [*340] Because this case involves the restriction of pure commercial speech which does “no more than propose a commercial transaction,” Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. S. 748, 762 (1976),7 our Fir…
• German Ortiz v. Hon. Rafael Hernandez Colon, 511 F.2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1975)
  …ledo held it no less entitled than the states to protection of three-judge scrutiny under section 2281. 416 U.S. at 670-75, 94 S.Ct. 2080, 40 L.Ed.2d 452. Cf. Wackenhut Corp. v. Rordiguez Aponte, D.P.R., 1966, 266 F.Supp. 401, 405, aff’d per curiam, 386 U.S. 268, 87 S.Ct. 1017, 18 L.Ed.2d 37. Because jurisdictional requirements in Calero Toledo were clearly satisfied under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the [*1082] Court refrained from considering whether the Commonwealth might also be characterized as a state for the p…