CITY OF GALVESTON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harborlite Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 613 F.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …g questions of law and the application of law to fact. See, e. g., ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States, 548 F. 2d 147, 151 (6th Cir. 1977); City of Galveston v. United States, 257 F.Supp. 243, 245-46 (S.D.Tex. 1966) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. 386 U.S. 269, 87 S.Ct. 1018, 18 L.Ed.2d 38 (1967). The requirement of findings and reasons commands the Commission to articulate its decision with sufficient clarity to allow us to decide whether these standards have been met.11 IV. THE COMMISSION’S TREATMENT O…
• Nat'l Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n, Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 590 F.2d 1180 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …0741. . E. g., Metals or Metal Alloys, 311 I.C.C. 617, 618 (1960). . See Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Tennessee, 262 U.S. 318, 322, 43 S.Ct. 583, 67 L.Ed. 999 (1923); City of Galveston v. United States, 257 F.Supp. 243, 246 (S.D.Tex.1966), aff'd, 386 U.S. 269, 87 S.Ct. 1018, 18 L.Ed.2d 38 (1967). . J.A. at 93-221. The Commission did not give great weight to the carriers’ presentation, asserting that “no supporting evidence” for the proposition was presented. The Commission added, “On the other hand, [th…