DECKARD
v.
WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY

U.S. | 1967-03-13
No. 533
386 U.S. 284 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ'of certiorari are granted. The judgment-is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court, of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U. S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U. S. 406, 416.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Swenson v. Donnell, 382 F.2d 248 (8th Cir. 1967)
    …uglas would be given retroactive effect to preDouglas Missouri convictions, that question was, in our view, settled by Hester v. Swenson, 386 U.S. 261, 87 S.Ct. 1039, 18 L.Ed.2d 49 (March 13, 1967) and Deckard v. Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary, 386 U.S. 284, 87 S.Ct. 1041, 18 L.Ed.2d 50 (March 13, 1967), decided contemporaneously with Swenson v. Bosler, supra.2 The convictions of Hester and Deckard, Missouri prisoners, had been affirmed by the Missouri Supreme Court prior to the advent of Douglas. Stat…
  • Maness v. Swenson, 385 F.2d 943 (8th Cir. 1967)
    …oted that the question of retrospective application of Douglas to the Missouri practice of appellate review for indigent defendants was settled in Hester v. Swenson, 386 U.S. 261, 87 S.Ct. 1039, 18 L. Ed.2d 49 (March 13, 1967) and Deckard v. Warden, 386 U.S. 284, 87 S.Ct. 1041,18 L.Ed.2d 50 (March 13, 1967), these cases having been decided after Judge Oliver’s District Court opinion. The only point we are attempting to make here is that the Missouri practice of appellate review for indigents whereby the Sup…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw