GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
386 U.S. 348
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ass'n OF Am. Railroads v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 564 F.2d 486 (D.C. Cir. 1977)…-bulk commodities, was derived not from the express language of section 303(b) but from the Commission’s construction of the general intent of the section. See Gulf Canal Lines v. United States, 258 F.Supp. 864, 868-69 (E.T). Tex. 1966), affd. mem., 386 U.S. 348, 87 S.Ct. 1161, 18 L.Ed.2d 98 (1967); 2 U.S. Department of Transportation, The Barge Mixing Rule Problem: A Report to the Congress, App. C.10-C.18 (1973) [hereinafter cited as DOT Report]. . The 1970 amendment added a sentence immediately following…1 / 2