BERMAN
v.
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
BERMAN
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
386 U.S. 481
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Norvell v. Sangre de Cristo Dev. Co., Inc., 519 F.2d 370 (10th Cir. 1975)…on advisory in nature. We are cognizant of our rule that the decision of the federal trial court to afford declaratory relief must be sustained, absent a clear abuse of discretion. Shannon v. Sequeechi, 365 F. 2d 827 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 481, 87 S.Ct. 1175, 18 L.Ed.2d 225 (1967). This court has consistently held, however, that the test for determining an actual controversy via declaratory judgment proceedings is whether there is a controversy between the parties having adverse legal int…
-
Berman v. Bd. OF Elections, 420 F.2d 684 (2d Cir. 1969)…ted.” 19 N.Y.2d 744, 279 N.Y.S.2d 348, 226 N.E. 2d 177 (1967). This was followed by Berman’s appeal to the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal “for want of jurisdiction” and treated the papers as an application for certiorari which it denied. 386 U.S. 481, 87 S.Ct. 1175, 18 L.Ed.2d 225, rehearing denied 387 U.S. 926, 87 S.Ct. 2028, 18 L.Ed.2d 986 (1967). On October 1, 1969 the Board of Elections amended the election regulations to provide, in substance, that any person whose religious convictions pr…
-
Sperl v. Deukmejian, 642 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1981)…Kentucky, 400 F. 2d 871, 872 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911, 89 S.Ct. 1755, 23 [*1155] L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); Booker v. Arkansas, 380 F. 2d 240, 242 (8th Cir. 1967); Shannon v. Sequeechi, 365 F. 2d 827, 829 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 481, 87 S.Ct. 1175, 18 L.Ed.2d 225 (1967). Sperl argues that his complaint should therefore be treated as a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Habeas corpus relief is not appropriate because Sperl was not in custody when he filed…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence