D'AMICO

v.

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1969)
  …are the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co., and the Southern Railway [*373] System. Effective July 1, 1967, Coast Line and Seaboard merged. See Florida E. C. R. Co. v. United States, 259 F. Supp. 993 (1966), aff’d, 386 U. S. 544 (1967). For a discussion of one aspect of this unusual joint venture agreement, see Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. Florida E. C. R. Co., 363 F. 2d 216 (1966). The signs read: “Fellow Railroad Men Do Not Cross or Assist F. E. C. B. of R. T. On La…
• United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 396 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1970)
  …is & St. L. R. Co. v. United States, 361 U. S. 173, 186-188 (1959); Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. United States, 382 U. S. 154, 156-157 (1965); see Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United States, 259 F. Supp. 993 (D. C. M. D. Fla. 1966), aff’d per curiam, 386 U. S. 544 (1967). The Department urges that the Commission failed to give sufficient weight to the diminution of competition between the Northern Lines — in short, that it failed to strike the correct balance between antitrust objectives and the overall tran…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.R. Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 632 F.2d 392 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …I.C.C. 309, 339 (1964); Seaboard Air Line R.R.-Merger-Atlantic Coast Line, 320 I.C.C. 122, 203-204 (1963), aff’d Florida East Coast Ry. v. United States, 259 F.Supp. 993, 1019 (M.D.Fla.1966), dismissed as moot sub nom. R. L. E. A. v. United States, 386 U.S. 544, 87 S.Ct. 1299, 18 L.Ed.2d 285 (1967); Chesapeake & O. Ry.-Control-Baltimore & O. R.R., 317 I.C.C. 261 (1962); Southern Ry.-Control-Central of Georgia Ry., 317 I.C.C. 557, 567-8 (1962), aff'd, R. L. E. A. v. United States, 226 F.Supp. 521 (E.D.Va.19…

  ← 1 / 2 →