WALKLING

v.

RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1967)
  …s probation was revoked and sentence imposed. The Washington Supreme Court denied the petition on June 23, 1966, by a vote of six [*132] to three. Mempa v. Rhay, 68 Wash. 2d 882, 416 P. 2d 104. We granted certiorari to consider the questions raised. 386 U. S. 907 (1967). Petitioner William Earl Walkling was convicted in the Thurston County Superior Court on October 29, 1962, of burglary in the second degree on the basis of his plea of guilty entered with the advice of his retained counsel. He was placed on…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n, 389 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1967)
  …er, went beyond the arbitrator’s award in that they raised a separate [*72] question of notice. Cf. n. 4, supra. The District Judge did not comment upon this aspect of the case in holding the union guilty of contempt. 365 F. 2d 295, 368 F. 2d 932. 386 U. S. 907, 387 U. S. 916. Other issues have been argued as well. In light of our disposition of these cases, we do not reach them. Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills, 353 U. S. 448, upheld federal judicial power to issue such an enforcement order. In Si…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 390 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1968)
  …r a supplier’s granting to a retailer who buys directly from it promotional allowances that are not made available to a wholesaler who resells to retailers competing with the direct-buying retailer violates Section 2 (d) of the Robinson-Patman Act.” 386 U. S. 907. The Court today agrees with the Court of Appeals’ answer to this question and holds that wholesalers are not customers “competing” with the respondent. But the Court nevertheless goes on to hold that § 2 (d) was violated upon a theory not argued h…

  ← 1 / 2 →