CARTWRIGHT

v.

OREGON

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …1 [18 L.Ed.2d 1040] (1967)), but even there, his expectation under certain circumstances could be unwarranted, for example, when he speaks too loudly. See State v. Cartwright, [246 Or. 120], 418 P. 2d 822 (Ore. 1966), certiorari denied 87 S.Ct. 961, 386 U.S. 937 [17 L.Ed.2d 810] (1967). The person’s expectation that his communication is or is not subject to “interception,” defined in paragraph (4), discussed below, is thus to be gathered and evaluated from and in terms of all the facts and circumstances. S…
• United States v. Titus Thomas, 489 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …is clearly lacking in probable cause. See United States v. Harwood, 470 F. 2d, [*671] 322, 324-325 (10th Cir. 1972); United States v. Roth, 391 F. 2d 507, 511 (7th Cir. 1967); United States v. Botsch, 364 F. 2d 542, 546 (2d Cir. 1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 937, 87 S.Ct. 959, 17 L.Ed.2d 810 (1967); United States v. Pearce, 275 F. 2d 318 (7th Cir. 1960); United States v. Henderson, 17 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C.1954). The Seventh and Fourth Circuits have also held that the willful or intentional use of a fictitious na…
• United States v. Halbert, 436 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …ral officers whereby the salutary purposes of Rule 5 are subtly circumvented.” [415 F. 2d at 170.] See Anderson v. United States (1943), 318 U.S. 350, 63 S.Ct. 599, 87 L.Ed. 829; Butterwood v. United States (10 Cir. 1966), 365 F. 2d 380, cert. den. 386 U.S. 937, 87 S.Ct. 960, 17 L.Ed.2d 810; United States v. Coppola (2 Cir. 1960), 281 F. 2d 340, aff’d per curiam 365 U.S. 762, 81 S.Ct. 884, 6 L.Ed.2d 79 (1961); Barnett v. United States (5 Cir. 1967), 384 F. 2d 848; United States v. Hindmarsh (6 Cir. 1968),…