HOFFA

v.

UNITED STATES; PARKS V. UNITED STATES; CAMPBELL V. UNITED STATES; AND KING V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Willy Harris v. State, 342 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …We have carefully considered the points on appeal in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that reversible error has not been shown. Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. den. 386 U.S. 940, 951, 87 S.Ct. 970, 17 L.Ed.2d 880; Spinkellink v. State, 313 So. 2d 666 (Fla.1975); Grant v. State, 171 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1965); State v. Sellers, 281 So. 2d 397 (Fla.2d DCA 1973). Affirmed.…
• Provident Tradesmens Bank & Tr. Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1968)
  …; and that since Dutcher could not be joined as a defendant without destroying diversity jurisdiction the action had to be dismissed. Since this ruling presented a serious challenge to the scope of the newly amended Rule 19, we granted cer-tiorari. 386 U. S. 940. Concluding that the inflexible approach adopted by the Court of Appeals in this case exemplifies the kind of reasoning that the Rule was designed to avoid, we reverse. I. The applicable parts of Rule 19 read as follows: “Rule 19. Joinder of Pers…
• United States v. Estepa, 471 F.2d 1132 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …ed States v. Arcuri, 282 F.Supp. 347, 350 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir. 1968). We had hoped that, with the clear warnings we have given to prosecutors, going back to United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940, 87 S.Ct. 975, 17 L.Ed.2d 872 cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967), and the assurances given by United States Attorneys, see United States v. Arcuri, supra, 405 F. 2d at 693 & n. 4, a reversal fo…