JOHNSTON

v.

DUTTON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dougherty, 473 F.2d 1113 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …, may be denied when the trial court finds the defendants rights should [sio] not be sufficiently protected if he appeared on his own behalf. [Citing United States v. Davis, supra; United States v. Jones, 369 F. 2d 217 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 944, 87 S.Ct. 976, 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967).] [T]he right to appear pro se may also be denied when the trial court finds that this allowance would be likely to disrupt the proceedings. [Citing United States v. Private Brands, Inc., 250 F. 2d 554 (2d Cir. 1…
• Gandy v. State OF Ala., 569 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …Carey v. Rundle, supra 409 F. 2d at 1215. See also United States v. Inman, 488 F. 2d 738, 739-40 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 988, 94 S.Ct. 2394, 40 L.Ed.2d 766 (1974); United States v. Jones, 369 F. 2d 217, 219 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 944, 87 S.Ct. 976, 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1966); Thacker v. Slayton, 375 F.Supp. 1332, 1335 (E.D.Va.1974). Thus, the right to counsel theme of the due process clause has at least four important variations: the right to have counsel, the right to a minimal qua…
• Grady S. Patterson v. Tulsa Local NO. 513, 446 F.2d 205 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …B (1969), 394 U.S. 423, 89 S.Ct. 1154, 22 L.Ed.2d 385; NLRB v. International Bro. of Boilermakers Etc. No. 338 (10th Cir. 1969), 409 F. 2d 922; Kalish v. Hosier (D.C.Colo.1965), 256 F.Supp. 853, affirmed (10th Cir. 1966), 364 F. 2d 829, cert. denied 386 U.S. 944, 87 S.Ct. 972, 17 L.Ed.2d 874. Patterson contends that his right to enforcement of Article 16 relates solely to an internal union matter, unaffected by federal legislation, but enforcement of his union seniority would be clearly violative of § 158,…