SPENCER
v.
TEXAS; BELL V. TEXAS; REED V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; ZUCKERMAN ET AL. V. GREASON; SHERIDAN CREATIONS, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; PATTERSON ET AL. V. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS ET AL.; KANSAS CITY TRANSIT, INC. V. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI; GOODSPEED V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; TAYLOR V. TEXAS; COLLINS V. WILSON, WARDEN; COLLIER V. UNITED STATES; JACOBS V. UNITED STATES; REED V. CALIFORNIA; JOHNSON V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ET AL.; STELL V. PENNSYLVANIA

U.S. | 1967-03-13
Nos. 68; No. 69; No. 70; No. 71; No. 747; No. 820; No. 846; No. 2; No. 21; No. 210; No. 511; No. 963; No. 1016; No. 1057; No. 1089; No. 1118
386 U.S. 969 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Williams, 445 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1971)
    …nvictions, has noted that “limiting instructions on this subject are no more difficult to comprehend or apply than those upon various other subjects; * * * ” Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 563, 87 S.Ct. 648, 653, 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 969, 87 S.Ct. 1015, 18 L.Ed.2d 125 (1967); Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 485, 69 S.Ct. 213, 93 L.Ed. 168 (1948). In this case, no instruction was given when the evidence of other crimes was admitted nor in the court’s general instructions.…
  • Wansley v. Slayton, 487 F.2d 90 (4th Cir. 1973)
    …select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination.” . See, United States v. Bowe (2d Cir. 1966) 360 F. 2d 1, 12, cert, denied 385 U.S. 961, 87 S.Ct. 401, 17 L.Ed.2d 306, reh. denied 386 U.S. 969, 87 S.Ct. 1040, 18 L.Ed.2d 127, where the Court very clearly marks out the difference between “prejudicial information during the trials” and prejudicial publicity antedating trial in distinguishing United States v. Accardo (7th Cir. 1962) 298 F. 2d…
  • United States v. Edwards, 443 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1971)
    …m a marshal some previous day.” While evidence of another crime is generally inadmissible, it is admissible when used to establish a material fact or issue in the case. Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 560, 87 S.Ct. 648, 17 L.Ed.2d 606, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 969, 87 S.Ct. 1015, 18 L.Ed.2d 125 (1967); Love v. United States, 386 F. 2d 260, 266 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 985, 88 S.Ct. 1111, 19 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1968); Tucker v. United States, 375 F. 2d 363, 371 n.9 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 8…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw