STERLING
v.
UNITED STATES
STERLING
UNITED STATES
386 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 30 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (30 total)
-
Carter v. Jury Comm'n of Greene Cnty., 396 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1970)…more than $5,000.” 18 U. S. C. § 243. Cf. Whitus v. Georgia, supra, at 552. Cf. Witcher v. Peyton, 405 F. 2d 725, 727. Cf. Gray v. Main, 309 F. Supp. 207, 224. Cf. Brooks v. Beto, 366 F. 2d 1, 27 (Wisdom, J., concurring in result), cert, denied, 386 U. S. 975. According to the appellants, civil suits challenging alleged racial discrimination in jury selection have been commenced in federal district courts throughout Alabama. Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443, 473 (opinion of Mr. Justice Reed, announcing ju…
-
Rowe v. Gen. Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972)…xtent. We accordingly disagree with the Trial Court’s finding that the promotion/transfer procedures were not discriminatory.15 [*357] “Figures speak and when they do, Courts listen.” Brooks v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1966, 366 F. 2d 1, 9, cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 975, 87 S.Ct. 1169, 18 L.Ed.2d 135. The figures are here vivid and significant.16 They reveal — subject to GM’s extenuating explanation — a great disparity in employment opportunities for Blacks which, at least so far as promotions/transfers to nonhourl…
-
United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)…percentage requirements reflecting a cross-section of the community. This is true of both constitutional cases (see Swain v. Alabama, 1965, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759; Brooks v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1966, 366 F. 2d 1, 22 n. 40, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 975, 87 S.Ct. 1169, 18 L.Ed.2d 135; Billingsley v. Clayton, 5 Cir. 1966, 359 F. 2d 13, 15-18, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 841, 87 S.Ct. 92, 17 L.Ed. 2d 74) and cases based on the former federal jury act (see Hunt v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F. 2d 306,…
Previewing 3 of 30 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence